Skip to content

Are You Really This Clever, Andrew Breitbart…? (I Hope So!)

August 27, 2010

This is another cut & paste of an email I received; it is a response to the WSJ article published July 28, 2010 : “Our Divisive President“, by Patrick H. Cadell & Douglas E. Schoen…two registered Democrats…on allegations of Obama dividing America along racial lines.

Andrew Breitbart is a media genius.

He proved it originally with his brilliant handling of the ACORN ‘hooker’ scandal which he skillfully manipulated so that the corrupt media was forced, against its will, to broadcast corruption in one of Obama’s most powerful political support groups. But Breitbart’s handing of that affair is nothing compared to his brilliant manipulation of the Shirley Sherrod ‘white farmer’ scandal.

It all began last Monday, July 22, 2010. As the country watched in horror, Breitbart released a snippet of a tape on his “Big Government” site which showed an obscure black female official of the Dept. of Agriculture laughing to a roomful of NAACP members about how she’d discriminated against a destitute white farmer and refused to give him the financial aid he desperately needed.

As she smirked to the room, she’d sent him instead to a white lawyer – ‘one of his own kind’ – for help.

The black woman was Shirley Sherrod – and almost immediately she became the center of a firestorm of controversy which exploded throughout the country.

Within a day of the release of that infamous tape, the head of the Dept. of Agriculture, spurred on by Obama, demanded – and received – Sherrod’s resignation.

Breitbart had won.

But then seemingly Breitbart’s actions began to explode in his face.

As Sherrod screamed in protest, FOX News released the entire text of her speech last March to the NAACP.

And there on tape Sherrod was shown supposedly repenting of her racism against a white farmer and instead championing his fight to win funds to keep his farm afloat.

Within hours of that entire tape being revealed, the entire world turned against Andrew Breitbart.

Conservatives throughout the country were enraged that he’d endangered their reputations by releasing a ‘doctored’ tape.
Breitbart, they thundered, had dealt a fatal blow to the conservative media.

I confess that I also was horrified at what I saw as the clumsiness and stupidity of Breitbart in ‘doctoring’ a tape to make a supposedly innocent woman look guilty. But now I discover I have been as guilty of haste to judgment of Breitbart as the Dept. of Agriculture was of Ms. Sherrod.

Only now am I realizing the real purpose for Breitbart’s release of that tape snippet. It was to allow him to cunningly trick the media into exposing one of the most shocking examples of corruption in the federal government – a little known legal case called “Pigford v. Glickman”.

Check it out for yourself by clicking HERE.

“In 1997, 400 African-American farmers sued the United States Department of Agriculture, alleging that they had been unfairly denied USDA loans due to racial discrimination during the period 1983 to 1997.”

The case was entitled “Pigford v. Glickman” and in 1999, the black farmers won their case.

The government agreed to pay each of them as much as $50,000 to settle their claims.

But then on February 23, 2010, something shocking happened in relation to that original judgment:
In total silence, the USDA agreed to release more funds to “Pigford”.

The amount was a staggering…… $1.25 billion. This was because the original number of plaintiffs – 400 black farmers – had now…. swollen in a class action suit to include a total of 86,000 black farmers throughout America.

There was only one teensy problem:
The United States of America doesn’t have 86,000 black farmers !!!!

According to accurate and totally verifiable Official USDA 2007 Census census data, the total number of black farmers throughout America is only 39,697. Hmmm… by the Official USDA 1992 Census data the US had only 18,816 black farmers !!

Oops !!

Well, gosh – – how on earth did 39,697 explode into the fraudulent 86,000 claims ??

And how did $50,000 explode into $1.25 billion ??
Well, folks, you’ll just have to ask the woman who not only spearheaded this case because of her position in 1997 at the “Rural Development Leadership Network” but whose family received the highest single payout (approximately $13 million) from that action:

Shirley Sherrod.

Oops again !!

Yes, folks. It appears that Ms. Sherrod had just unwittingly exposed herself as the perpetrator of one of the biggest fraud claims in the United States – – a fraud enabled solely because she screamed racism at the government and cowed them into submission. And it gets even more interesting.

Ms. Sherrod has also exposed the person who aided and abetted her in this race fraud. As it turns out, the original judgment of “Pigford v. Glickman” in 1999 only applied to a total of about 16,000 black farmers.

But…. in 2008, a junior US Senator got a law passed to reopen the case and allow more black farmers to sue for funds. The Senator was…

Barack Hussein Obama.

Because this law was passed in dead silence and because the woman responsible for spearheading it was an obscure USDA official, American taxpayers did not realize that they had just been forced in the midst of a worldwide depression to pay out more than $1.25 billion to settle a race claim.

But Breitbart knew. And last Monday, July 22, 2010, he cleverly laid a trap which Sherrod – – and Obama & his cronies – – stumbled headfirst into which has now resulted in the entire world discovering the existence of this corrupt financial judgment.
As for Ms. Sherrod ?? Well, she’s discovering too late that her cry of ‘racism’ to the media which was intended to throw the spotlight on Breitbart has instead thrown that spotlight on herself – and the huge corruption.
Sherrod has vanished from public view. Her ‘pigs’, it seems, have come home to roost.

Oink !!!!

But the perpetrator of that law passed in dead silence leading to unlawful claims & corruption….. is still trying to fool all of US.

Google and read for yourself
Pigford vs. Glickman


“The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.”
-Author Unknown


Islamophobic Hate-Mongering …… or The Shape of Things to Come? Read It…and Judge for Yourself.

August 26, 2010

Here’s something to think about…

Here is the speech of Geert Wilders, Chairman, Party for Freedom, the Netherlands, at the Four Seasons, New York, introducing an Alliance of Patriots and announcing the Facing Jihad Conference in Jerusalem…

“Dear friends,

Thank you very much for inviting me.

I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe. This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe.

First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe. Then, I will say a few things about Islam. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem.

The Europe you know is changing.

You have probably seen the landmarks. But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration.

All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighborhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen.. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. It’s the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children.

Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street corners. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighborhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe. These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe, street by street, neighborhood by neighborhood, city by city.

There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe. With larger congregations than there are in churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule.

Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam , Marseille and Malmo in Sweden. In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighborhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities.

In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims.

Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils. In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims.

Non-Muslim women routinely hear, ‘whore, whore.’ Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country of origin.

In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin . The history of the Holocaust can no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity.

In England sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighborhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves. Last week a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels, because he was drinking during the Ramadan.

Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya, Israel. I could go on forever with stories like this. Stories about Islamization.

A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe. San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.

Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France. One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favor of a worldwide caliphate. Muslims demand what they call ‘respect‘. And this is how we give them respect. We have Muslim official state holidays.

The Christian-Democratic attorney general is willing to accept sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey.

Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behavior, ranging from petty crimes and random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus. I call the perpetrators ‘settlers’. Because that is what they are. They do not come to integrate into our societies; they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam. Therefore, they are settlers.

Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighborhoods, their cities, their countries. Moreover, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored.

The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet. His behavior is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and had several marriages – at the same time. Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad.

Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion. Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, and 72 virgins. But in its essence Islam is a political ideology. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam, in spite of what the apologists claim, does not mean ‘peace‘ … Islam means ‘submission‘. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is sharia. If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies.

Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam ‘the most retrograde force in the world’, and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Qur’an. The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor. I have lived in this country and visited it dozens of times. I support Israel. First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defense.

This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam’s territorial advance. Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines, Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan, Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia. Israel is simply in the way. The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.
The war against Israel is not a war against Israel. It is a war against the West. It is jihad. Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been no Israel, Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest. Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.

Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behavior, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed. The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything.

So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as a ‘right-wing extremists’ or ‘racists’. In my country, the Netherlands, 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake since World War II. And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat. Yet there is a danger greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing. The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine. An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America – as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs. With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome , Athens and Jerusalem.

Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts. My generation never had to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their lives. All throughout Europe, American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and whose memory we cherish. My generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians. We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe ‘s children in the same state in which it was offered to us. We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations would never forgive us. We cannot squander our liberties. We simply do not have the right to do so.

We have to take the necessary action now to stop this Islamic stupidity from destroying the free world that we know.”


All of the above is true, not an internet rumor:
Geert Wilders is a Dutch Member of Parliament

For All That You Have Done To Make America Great Again… I Thank You, President Obama!

August 21, 2010

I had an epiphany a few hours ago.
It was during a conversation I had with a few friends & coworkers of mine. A few of them claim to be apolitical but expressed concerns about the current situation in America…politically, socially,and economically. A couple more were either liberal or registered Democrats, but were expressing misgivings about the vote they cast back in November 2008…and were seriously concerned about others who claim to share their political ideology in this day & age. And then there was me…the only registered Republican conservative of the group.
We had a fascinating conversation about current events and politics. I had a chance to listen to their political views, I had a chance to rebut their political assertions, and I had a chance to express my own political views.
My epiphany came when I realized that, of everybody who was involved in our discussion, I was the most optimistic of us all.
More than all of the Obama supporters and disinterested participants…it was I who was most hopeful. Hopeful for our country…hopeful for our future. And I realized that all of this optimism that I held was solely because of one man…one man and his grand vision for America:

President Barack Obama.

So I am typing this blog to give sincere thanks to this ambitious man who has done so much to make the United States of America a better place…to restore the luster to our great country and to return America to its rightful place as the greatest nation in human history.

Because of Barack Obama, Americans are waking up…waking up from a decades-long coma. Americans are finally emerging from their self-involvement and realizing that our country has a serious problem: we have allowed the wrong people to gain access to our highest seats of power. People whose hatred of our country and our ideals have been the motivation for their avarice-addled aspirations to austerity and authority in America…all alliteration aside! 😉
We have allowed them to have unwarranted influence over our most impressionable and our most important resource: our children.
We have been cowed by an agenda-driven organization that anointed itself “The Fourth Estate“, blithely ignorant of its machinations, its elitism, and its lies.

And now, we have opened our eyes and we are finally seeing just how troubling…how dangerous…how frightening…it is that these same people currently hold so much sway…so much power…so much control in America.

Correction: “…so much control OF America.”

America is finally taking notice.
And America doesn’t like what it is seeing at all.
And what’s more…America isn’t going to ignore this problem anymore!

Thanks to President Barack Obama, these power-hungry elitists were under the impression that the 2008 election was a triumphant culmination of decades of effort to achieve their lofty goals. They believed that nothing stood in the way of their final push towards their ultimate goal. They believed that the the finish line was in sight.
They just didn’t take two small items into consideration:
Reality and sunshine.
Just as they started down the proverbial home stretch, reality began to trip up their progression. The many European models that they held up in comparison to what they saw as America’s failing began to wither as paragons of example.
In spite of this, these elitists doggedly refused to see the writing on the wall; they stubbornly insisted that they were right…that theirs was the true way…and that everything would work exactly as they wanted it to work…once they got everything they wanted, the way they wanted it.

But that harsh reality was exposed to sunlight. And in that sunlight, the failings were brazenly displayed. So brazen, so obvious, that even the most apathetic citizen took notice. But what the citizens of America noticed even more than the flaws in their system was the behavior of those who continued to advocate such a flawed, failing system.

We saw their arrogance.

We saw their hypocrisy.

We saw their condescension.

We saw their utter indifference to our concerns.

We saw their smug disregard to our views, our feelings, our opinions.

We saw their indignant outrage when we dared to even question their ideas.

And such displays shocked us. They troubled us. They angered us.
And it motivated us from apathy to action.
We learned of their secrets. We learned their own tricks and schemes from the very tricksters who taught them…

…in conjunction with a few tricks of our own.

For some, it was the type of motivation that they’ve never acted on before.

But, in taking action, we discovered that other shared our concerns. Many others. And in banding together we motivated others to stand up and speak out.

Soon, our ranks grew to formidable numbers. And what was most interesting about our numbers is that we weren’t a homogenized group-think army. We weren’t a seasoned band of professional activists. And we weren’t a rowdy gang of violent antagonists.

But there are words that definitely describes us best:


We are many rugged individuals, with nearly as many viewpoints, and yet we seek a common cause and speak with a unified voice in opposition to our freedom and liberty being trampled upon in the march towards Socialism.
Out Of Many…One.
Don’t Tread On Us.

And like some spoiled children who discover that they aren’t going go get things their way anymore, they’re lashing out in immature conceit…denigrating our views…
…calling us names such as “racists”…

…belittling our ideology…marginalizing our efforts.
Or just plain ignoring us.

And this is only motivating us further.
And that motivation will move us towards greater things.
A greater tomorrow.
A tomorrow without the corrupt, destructive, soul-killing policies that currently are poisoning the well of American prosperity and freedom.

So thank you very much, President Barack Obama.
Because of your effort and the efforts of those in Washington DC who support your grand vision, The United States of America will become a much better place.

Just not the place you & Congress are striving for!

Thought Crimes and Basic Math

July 28, 2010

A federal judge has ruled in favor of a public university that removed an Arithmetic student from its graduate program in Basic Math over her belief that “2 + 2 = 22” is mathematically wrong.

Monday’s ruling, according to Julea Ward’s attorneys, could result in “Old Math” students across the country being expelled from public university for similar views.

It’s a very dangerous precedent,” Jeremy Tedesco, legal counsel for the conservative Alliance Defense Fund, told FOX News Radio. “The ruling doesn’t say that explicitly, but that’s what is going to happen.”

U.S. District Judge George Caram Steeh dismissed Ward’s lawsuit against Eastern Michigan University. She was removed from the school’s basic math program last year because she planned to refuse to give passing grades to students who believed that 2 + 2 = 22.

The university contended she violated school policy and the American Arithmetic Association code of ethics.

Traditional Math students shouldn’t be expelled for holding to and abiding by their beliefs,” said ADF senior counsel David French. “To reach its decision, the court had to do something that’s never been done in federal court: uphold an extremely broad and vague university speech code.”

Eastern Michigan University hailed the decision.

We are pleased that the court has upheld our position in this matter,” EMU spokesman Walter Kraft said in a written statement. “Julea Ward was not discriminated against because of her views about whether 2 + 2 = 4 or if it can or cannot also equal 22. To the contrary, Eastern Michigan is deeply committed to the education of our students and welcomes individuals from diverse backgrounds into our community…except in cases where such diverse backgrounds fly in the face of our narcissistic, narrow-minded ideology. And thanks to the ruling by U.S. District Judge George Steeh, we can continue to attack and punish those who dare to not think the exact same way we do.”

In his 48-page opinion, Judge Steeh said the university had a rational basis for adopting the ACA Code of Ethics.

Furthermore, the university had a rational basis for requiring students to counsel clients without imposing their personal values…it is WE who are the only ones who have the right to impose their views on others who disagree, not the students,” he wrote in a portion of his ruling posted by The Detroit News. “In the case of Ms. Ward, the university determined that she would never change her behavior and would consistently refuse to teach students on matters with which she was personally opposed due to her scientific beliefs – including the concept of 2 + 2 =22.”

Ward’s attorneys claim the university told her she would only be allowed to remain in the program if she went through a “remediation” program so that she could “see the error of her ways” and change her belief system about new math.

If you ask a group of student ‘What do you get if you put two and two together?’, there will be many students…at least one in ten…who will claim that the answer is 22” EMU spokesman Walter Kraft said in a written statement. “To condemn such out-of-the-box thinking would be destructive to the self-esteem of those students. Such an answer may not be accurate from a boring, old basic arithmetic point of view, but we feel it is necessary to encourage students…especially the very young & impressionable…to view such answers as ‘cool, clever, and interesting’ so that we can get as many students to buy into the idea that ’22’ is the correct answer.”
Perhaps, if we are successful, these students will grow into adults who will put such ideas into practice in the real world outside of academics” Kraft said.

A spokesperson for GLAAD (Groups that Love Alternate Answers and Definitions) gleefully supported the ruling, saying “For many years people who believed 2 + 2 = 4 was boring & staid were saddled with failing grades and ridicule from the math teachers of old. Now, at last, we can stand up to the majority and say proudly that our opinion is more important than the facts…and we will punish you if you don’t toe the line of our narrow, intolerant interpretation of our diverse viewpoint

The case is similar to a lawsuit the ADF filed against Augusta State University in Georgia. Math student Jennifer Keeton was allegedly told to stop sharing her traditional math beliefs in order to graduate.

Keeton’s lawsuit alleged that she was told to undergo a reeducation program and attend “diversity & self-esteem encouragement sensitivity training.”

University experts and supporters of the reeducation program cite their previous successes with the program…notably when a Mr. Winston Smith was shown the error of his ways back in 1984 and realized that 2 + 2 =5.

University officials declined to comment on specifics of the lawsuit but released a statement to FOX News that said …”Augusta State does not discriminate on the basis of students’ moral, religious, political or personal beliefs“…before muttering ‘yeah right’ under their breaths and doubling over with peals of laughter.

Tedesco said both cases should be a warning to Mathematicians attending public colleges and universities.

Public universities are imposing the ideological stances of private groups on their students,” he said. “If you don’t comply, you will be kicked out. It’s scary stuff and it’s not a difficult thing to see what’s coming down the pike.”


All seriousness aside…

2 + 2 = 4.

Why is this never questioned?
Simple. Because it’s the truth.
There’s nothing subjective about it. It isn’t open to interpretation. And anybody who tries to “prove” that there is an alternate answer is roundly & soundly proven wrong.
But if the subject matter is solely based on opinion, who are these university professors and activist judges to say that one opinion is “correct” and the other opinion is deserving of concerted and coercive “reeducation”?

2 + 2 = 5.

So, are the faculty of either universities “proving” their case? Are they saying “These are the facts…all else is conjecture“?

Because if Julea Ward and Jennifer Keeton are merely being forced to embrace a new opinion over their own…especially a new opinion that is rooted more in the corruptive culture of political correctness and social progressivism…it wouldn’t be an ‘education’ of any kind.

It would be indoctrination.

A Provocative Comparison (…If I Had The Guts To Do It…)

July 15, 2010

In November, Americans will be returning to the polls and will once again exercise their Constitutional right to vote for their preferred Congressional representative.

Wouldn’t it be interesting if…

…three white people dressed up in black leather jackets, black trousers, black combat boots, and black berets on their heads? In other words, three white people dressed up to look like members of the New Black Panther Party.

Then these three white people in their Black Panther paramilitary gear drive to a polling place in a predominately black section of town, park their car, get out, and take their pre-arranged positions in front of the polling place.Two of them will be wielding police nightsticks and the third will be wielding a camcorder. While the third person video records the event, the other two will openly brandish their nightsticks in their hands while they yell to every passing black voter “You gonna learn what it’s like being ruled by the black man, cracker!” and “We’s takin’ over, cracker!” and so on.
That’s right….they will refer to all black people entering the polling place as “crackers” and they will taunt every black voter with threats about being “ruled by the black man“.

The three white people would not use any racist rhetoric that would disparage blacks…they would only use racist rhetoric such as “cracker“, “honky“, “ofay” or any other white-bashing slurs.
Even better, the three white people would only quote, word-for-word, the exact same remarks used by King Samir Shabazz outside a Philadelphia polling station in 2008.
Only this time, these exact same remarks will be directed towards blacks….not whites.

Anyone want to guess what the reaction from the Department of Justice would be? Or how quickly they would react?
Yeah, I know: it would be a sucker bet.

Still….it would be rather interesting to see what would happen.

“…All I Wanna Do Is Have Some Fun…” at somebody else’s expense.

June 30, 2010

Well, once again, Ms. Sheryl Crow has displayed her vast enlightened intellect for all the world to see.

Not since her publicity crusade…I mean “Green” crusade…demanding that everybody limit their toilet paper usage to one single square per sit-down** has the bohemian bimbo garnered so much publicity to her noble cause.
Now, it would be all too easy for me to chime in with my own two cents about what I think of her claims, what I think of her sensibilities, and what I think of her in general.
But I won’t. Not today.
But if you really, really want to know what I think about Sheryl Crow…

I’ll let this speak for me.

It’s long past time that others knew this as well.

Where’s Mark David Chapman or Robert Bardo when you need them?

**-Yes, yes…I’ve heard about how Sheryl Crow’s publicity team has desperately claimed that her “one square of toilet paper” suggestions were nothing more than a joke.
I couldn’t care less.
When this festering c**t comes clean about Kevin Gilbert…I’ll come clean about the veracity of her “1-ply TP” assertions.

Nuance And Perspective…Yeah, Right!

June 7, 2010

Do you see any difference between the two pictures below?

Now, do you see any difference in the hatred in their statements?
For those of you that do…would it be worth the effort if I asked you why one hateful statement is acceptable to you and the other isn’t?
Because neither statement is acceptable to me.
Nor is the grossly contorted rationalization behind your own anti-Semitic ideology.