“Democracy in Norway”… An Excerpt from an Anonymous 4chan Contributor That is as Interesting as it is Troubling…
It’s been a while since my last post….things in my life haven’t exactly settled as I had hoped. In fact, they’ve become progressively worse.
If there is anybody that still bothers to read my stuff, I sincerely thank you for your support and apologize for my lack of contributions in 2011.
However, while browsing through /b/ (aka Random) on the infamous 4chan website, I came across a very interesting…and very troubling…entry.
It is from an anonymous source (as is typical on this site) who lives in Norway.
Here is an excerpt of what he/she had to say about the current state of affairs in Norway since the tragic, terrible shootings by Anders Behring Breivik back on July 22, 2011.
I’ll let it speak for itself…
Democracy in Norway by Anonymous 08/24/11(Wed)18:29:41 No.349596697
When the 22.07 shootings occured in Norway, we were promised more openness, more democracy, dialog and respect.
What I’m seeing around me now is the complete opposite. Voices are being silenced everywhere. If there is any news about immigrations or muslims, they disable the comment section. If, by chance, they leave it open, they delete any comment that are in any way, shape or form negative towards immigration. The left wing are free to say whatever they want, but as soon as someone from the right wing says anything, they are labeled racists.
I’m scared of what’s happening here.
People are getting more and more upset over where things are going, but the government does not listen. Over 50% of Norwegians DOES(sic) NOT want this unlimited flow of non-western immigrants flooding our country with a religion that still belongs in the dark ages.
Native Norwegian children in Oslo have to stay in school where up to 95% of students are immigrants. White, blonde girls are being called sluts. They dye their hair to get away, which of course, doesn’t happen.
Young boys are being harrassed for not being circumcised.
People are beaten for eating pork.
They don’t celebrate christmas in schools anymore, since that “might offend the muslims”.
Muslims demanded a picture of a pig be taken down in a hospital childrens ward.
There are rape-waves, where young Norwegian girls are raped. A 14 year old girl killed herself not too long ago, after being gang raped by africans.
Yet we are silenced. We are not allowed to feel anything about this, unless of course there’s a muslim being mistreated. Then it’s all over the news.
After the shooting, I was devastated. I didn’t want this for my country, but the last weeks I’ve seen where hatred like that comes from, when you are shot down in debates as a not very intelligent, low income racist.
I have no special powers. I have nothing, but my voice, and that is silenced. So I turn to you, anon. What can I do, what can we do?
Where most debates are being deleted.
The traitors who let these people into my country.
The organiztion that got 700 000 NOK for muslims to invite Norwegians for tea.
If this is true….and I have no reason to believe otherwise…then this is reprehensible.
Since I cannot embed this video, I’ll just add the link.
Please watch it…and think about it as well.
Thank you, SSgt Sal Giunta for your exemplary service.
And a belated thank you to the fallen soldiers who served with you.
At the request of Lee Stranahan at the website Big Government, I am posting the YouTube video of Othello Cross, a noted attorney for many Pigford settlement claimants, admitting openly that there are hundreds of fraudulent claims by nonexistent “black farmers” hoping to get a government check for $ 50,000 simply for being black.
Here it is…hopefully a few of you can see it before YouTube censors it.
If you aren’t already aware of this travesty, I strongly recommend you go to the Big Government site and read up on just how corrupt our government has become.
And please note how little the Mainstream Media is discussing this…
…please spread the word.
…and I won’t waste any time with an introduction.
Here it is…”cut & paste”.
(Please note: Multiple issues and various minor and major crises in my real life are still hindering my efforts to type any original blogs on a regular basis. To the two or three people who still continue to read my stuff…thank you for your support and your understanding. I hope to remedy this as soon as possible.)
Democrat, Independent, or Republican….the second half of this email should make all of us very sick, send this on …..especially the second half……
By Dewie Whetsell, Alaskan Fisherman.
As posted in comments on Greta’s article referencing the MoveOn ad about Sarah Palin.
The last 45 of my 66 years I’ve spent in a commercial fishing town in Alaska. I understand Alaska politics but never understood national politics well until this last year. Here’s the breaking point: Neither side of the Palin controversy gets it. It’s not about persona, style, rhetoric, it’s about doing things. Even Palin supporters never mention the things that I’m about to mention here.
1. Democrats forget when Palin was the Darling of the Democrats, because as soon as Palin took the Governor’s office away from a fellow Republican and tough SOB, Frank Murkowski, she tore into the Republican’s “Corrupt Bastards Club” (CBC) and sent them packing. Many of them are now residing in State housing and wearing orange jump suits The Democrats reacted by skipping around the yard, throwing confetti and singing, “la la la la” (well, you know how they are). Name another governor in this country that has ever done anything similar.
2. Now with the CBC gone, there were fewer Alaskan politicians to protect the huge, giant oil companies here. So she constructed and enacted a new system of splitting the oil profits called “ACES.” Exxon (the biggest corporation in the world) protested and Sarah told them, “don’t let the door hit you in the stern on your way out.” They stayed, and Alaska residents went from being merely wealthy to being filthy rich. Of course, the other huge international oil companies meekly fell in line. Again, give me the name of any other governor in the country that has done anything similar.
3. The other thing she did when she walked into the governor’s office is she got the list of State requests for federal funding for projects, known as “pork.” She went through the list, took 85% of the m and placed them in the “when-hell-freezes-over” stack. She let locals know that if we need something built, we’ll pay for it ourselves. Maybe she figured she could use the money she got from selling the previous governor’s jet because it was extravagant. Maybe she could use the money she saved by dismissing the governor’s cook (remarking that she could cook for her own family), giving back the State vehicle issued to her, maintaining that she already had a car, and dismissing her State provided security force (never mentioning – I imagine – that she’s packing heat herself). I’m still waiting to hear the names of those other governors.
4. Now, even with her much-ridiculed “gosh and golly” mannerism, she also managed to put together a totally new approach to getting a natural gas pipeline built which will be the biggest private construction project in the history of North America. No one else could do it although they tried. If that doesn’t impress you, then you’re trying too hard to be unimpressed while watching her do things like this while baking up a batch of brownies with her other hand.
5. For 30 years, Exxon held a lease to do exploratory drilling at a place called Point Thompson. They made excuses the entire time why they couldn’t start drilling. In truth they were holding it like an investment. No governor for 30 years could make them get started. Then, she told them she was revoking their lease and kicking them out. They protested and threatened court action. She shrugged and reminded them that she knew the way to the court house. Alaska won again.
6. President Obama wants the nation to be on 25% renewable resources for electricity by 2025. Sarah went to the legislature and submitted her plan for Alaska to be at 50% renewable by 2025. We are already at 25%. I can give you more specifics about things done, as opposed to style and persona. Everybody wants to be cool, sound cool, look cool. But that’s just a cover-up. I’m still waiting to hear from liberals the names of other governors who can match what mine has done in two and a half years. I won’t be holding my breath.
By the way, she was content to return to AK after the national election and go to work, but the haters wouldn’t let her. Now these adolescent screechers are obviously not scuba divers. And no one ever told them what happens when you continually jab and pester a barracuda. Without warning, it will spin around and tear your face off. Shoulda known better.
You have just read the truth about Sarah Palin that sends the media, along with the democrat party, into a wild uncontrolled frenzy to discredit her. I guess they are only interested in skirt chasers, dishonesty, immoral people, liars, womanizers, murderers, and bitter ex-presidents’ wives.
So “You go, Girl.” I only wish the men in Washington had your guts, determination, honesty, and morals.
I rest my case. Only FOOLS listen to the biased media.
If you’ve read this far …………………now, open your eyes……….
First Lady Michelle Obama’s Servant List and Pay Scale.
First Lady Requires More Than Twenty Attendants
1. $172,200 – Sher, Susan (Chief Of Staff)
2. $140,000 – Frye, Jocelyn C. (Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Policy And Projects For The First Lady)
3. $113,000 – Rogers, Desiree G. (Special Assistant to the President and White House Social Secretary)
4. $102,000 – Johnston, Camille Y. (Special Assistant to the President and Director of Communications for the First Lady)
5. $100,000 – Winter, Melissa E. (Special Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
6. $90,000 – Medina , David S. (Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
7. $84,000 – Lelyveld, Catherine M. (Director and Press Secretary to the First Lady)
8. $75,000 – Starkey, Frances M. (Director of Scheduling and Advance for the First Lady)
9. $70,000 – Sanders, Trooper (Deputy Director of Policy and Projects for the First Lady)
10. $65,000 – Burnough, Erinn J. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)
11. $64,000 – Reinstein, Joseph B. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)
12. $62,000 – Goodman, Jennifer R. (Deputy Director of Scheduling and Events Coordinator For The First Lady)
13. $60,000 – Fitts, Alan O. (Deputy Director of Advance and Trip Director for the First Lady)
14. $57,500 – Lewis, Dana M. (Special Assistant and Personal Aide to the First Lady)
15. $52,500 – Mustaphi, Semonti M. (Associate Director and Deputy Press Secretary to The First Lady)
16. $50,000 – Jarvis, Kristen E. (Special=2 0Assistant for Scheduling and Traveling Aide to The First Lady)
17. $45,000 – Lechtenberg, Tyler A. (Associate Director of Correspondence For The First Lady)
18. $43,000 – Tubman, Samantha (Deputy Associate Director, Social Office)
19. $40,000 – Boswell, Joseph J. (Executive Assistant to the Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
20. $36,000 – Armbruster, Sally M. (Staff Assistant to the Social Secretary)
21. $35,000 – Bookey, Natalie (Staff Assistant)
22. $35,000 – Jackson, Deilia A. (Deputy Associate Director of Correspondence for the First Lady)
(This is community organizing at it’s finest.)
There has NEVER been anyone in the White House at any time who has created such an army of staffers whose sole duties are the facilitation of the First Lady’s social life. One wonders why she needs so much help, at taxpayer expense, when even Hillary, only had three; Jackie Kennedy one; Laura Bush one; and prior to Mamie Eisenhower social help came from the President’s own pocket.
Note: This does not include makeup artist Ingrid Grimes-Miles, 49, and “First Hairstylist” Johnny Wright, 31, both of whom traveled aboard Air Force One to Europe.
FRIENDS…..THESE SALARIES ADD UP TO SIX MILLION, THREE HUNDRED SIXTY FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS ($6,364,000) FOR THE 4 YEARS OF OFFICE?????
AND WE ARE IN A RECESSION?
Well…most of us are.
I guess it’s okay to spend wildly when it’s not your own money, right?
Copyright 2009 CanadaFreePress.Com
….am I right?
Poison Meat for Poison Pens…How Karl Rove May Actually Be Helping Christine O’Donnell Win in November…(Maybe)
Some time ago, I read a rather unremarkable spy novel in which the key protagonists had to break into the sprawling mansion of a powerful Drug Cartel leader. Among the many obstacles the characters had to overcome to accomplish their objective, the outside grounds were patrolled by several menacing guard dogs which roamed freely throughout the vast estate. The main character and his associate, a wily veteran, would do “recon” at the premises every night…and every night the wily veteran would bring a bag of raw beef, sealed in a baggie, which he would throw to the barking, growling dogs as he walked by the perimeter fence.
The purpose of the free red meat to the guard dogs was evident the night of the attempted break-in: For the first couple of days, the guard dogs would regard the meat with suspicion, sniffing it carefully before eating it…but eventually the dogs would eat it. After that, the dogs would still bark & growl at him but when the meat was thrown to them they would no longer be hesitant to consume it within seconds after it was thrown to them.
And on the night of the break-in, the wily veteran threw the red meat to the guard dogs as expected and the guard dogs immediately snatched up the free meal and gobbled it down as expected…only this time the meat was poisoned.
Since the dogs no longer viewed the free meat with skepticism like they did at first, they didn’t check the meat before eating it.
Within minutes, the poisoned meat did them in.
On September 14, Christine O’Donnell was elected to become the Republican Senate Nominee for the state of Delaware, defeating incumbent Republican Senator Mike Castle in what many pundits and TV talking heads regarded as a shocking upset.
One of the more notable pundits/talking heads was Karl Rove, nicknamed “The Architect” during the George W. Bush presidency.
Rove was hardly shy about expressing his support for Mike Castle over O’Donnell before this election, and he is certainly entitled to his opinions, but it was what he said about Christine O’Donnell after the election results were announced that received a lot of attention.
For example, here…
…and here, the following day…
Why would he say such things? Why would he make such petty, hurtful comments about the woman who just made a come-from-behind victory over an established Washington insider with years of experience and resources?
Karl Rove is a smart, shrewd, and highly knowledgeable man…this made no sense to me at all! Not only was he taking cheap, almost slanderous pot-shots at O’Donnell, not only was he attacking her character instead of her policy platform, but he was also providing plenty of red meat for the Progressive Left & her Democrat opponents to use against her between now & November!
What’s worse, much if not most of the scurrilous accusations he made against her had pretty much been answered, so Rove was actually dredging up more slime to be thrown at her…slime that had supposedly settled, to turn a phrase.
I was confused. These actions made no sense to me. We’re talking about Karl Rove; a man who could out-argue fiscal, domestic, and foreign policy against any hate-filled Left-Wing Socialist hack from HuffPo or MSNBC with one hand tied behind his back!
So why would he so eagerly make such cheap shots at O’Donnell? If he didn’t support her, why not out-argue her position on political hot-button issues? Why bring up her personal history and essentially hold it out to the public as red meat for the attack dogs of the Mainstream Media, the Blogosphere, and the Democrat Party?
This seemed like such a stupid thing for him to do…especially if he really was a supporter of the Republican ticket as he claimed.
Why would he make Christine O’Donnell’s personal life so vulnerable to vicious attacks from the likes of The Huffington Post, DailyKos, and NBC News? Surely the venom that flows within their poison pens would be put to full use against her between now & the Midterm Elections in November, wouldn’t it?
And then it hit me:
Maybe the “read meat” is “poisoned”?
Maybe this wasn’t such a stupid thing to do after all?
Remember, these personal attacks against O’Donnell first started when her opponent was another Republican…now her opponent is a Democrat. A Democrat who has legions of supporters well-versed in Bill & Hillary Clinton’s “Politics of Personal Destruction”.
A Democrat who has thousands of Left Wing supporters on the Internet who are proud disciples of the tactics of Saul Alinsky.
A Democrat who can rely on the fawning, sycophantic Mainstream Media to try & dig up as much dirt on O’Donnell as possible…then slander her over the airwaves couched in the increasingly flimsy guise of “news”.
Never mind about her stance on Obama’s Health Care Takeover…we have video of O’Donnell talking about masturbation! It’s Modern Journalism 101!
Red meat for the attack dogs…courtesy of The Architect.
Even if you’ve already watched those clips above, please watch them again…notice how Rove almost immediately brings up O’Donnell’s alleged dirty laundry.
Remember: These accusations were levelled against her weeks ago. Not only did smearing her name hardly ruin her political chances, it actually mobilized her supporters and helped her gain some sympathy with independent voters who are just as aware of the partisan dirty tricks utilized these days…and are just as fed up with such tactics as I am!
Perhaps by focusing on these personal allegations instead of her political acumen, and thereby luring the Angry Left to focus their attacks that way as well, Rove might be helping Christine O’Donnell to win in November?
After all, he said that even though he wasn’t impressed with Christine O’Donnell personally, Rove said that he was a supporter of the Republican ticket.
And by his actions, Rove might very well be goading the Angry Hateful Left to attack O’Donnell in precisely the wrong manner…an attack that could backfire on the Democrats in the most spectacular way this November.
All of this is predicated, however, on the assumption that Karl “The Architect” Rove isn’t a stupid man…and is, in fact, a very cunning and very shrewd political strategist.
It reminds me somewhat of what Morgan Freeman’s character did in the movie Outbreak when Dustin Hoffman’s character was trying to stop the military from destroying the plague-infected town of Cedar Creek with a huge bomb….
(The scene I’m referring to is about 2:00 in)
Surely you don’t believe that he said those things because he was actually trying to help, do you?
Perhaps Karl Rove, in the supposed pretense of opposing O’Donnell’s nomination, dangled some juicy red meat for the Angry Left to gleefully consume…”red meat” in the form of personal attacks…in the hopes that the legions of Alinskyite Progressives will turn their proverbial poison pens against her…
…and consequently poison themselves in the process…
…which not only would further damage the Mainstream Media’s already tarnished reputation in the eyes of the public…
…and might also tarnish the reputation of Chris Coons, her Democrat opponent this November…
…it might actually enable Christine O’Donnell to win the Delaware Senate Seat in the Midterm Election this November.
In my opinion of course.
Originally, I had intended to post something on this solemn day: September 11, 2009.
Unfortunately, I made the mistake of reading the posts made by others before writing my own.
So now, because his column is so much better than anything I could’ve written, I’ve decided to cut & paste Andrew C. McCarthy’s latest effort from The National Review Online.
I hope you enjoy it.
Wishful thinking will not bring success or security.
by Andrew C. McCarthy
If only the fantasy were true: If only there actually were a dominant, pro-American, echt moderate Islam, an ideology so dedicated to human rights, so sternly set against savagery, that acts of terrorism were, by definition, “un-Islamic activity.” Imagine an Islam that, far from a liability, proved an asset (indeed, an indispensable asset) in combating the threat against us. Imagine that we could accurately call the threat mere “extremism” — no “Islamic” (or even “Islamist”) modifier being necessary because the “extremists” truly were a tiny, aberrant band, fraudulently “hijacking” a great religion.
If the fantasy were true, who among us would not be proud to mark the annual observance of September 11 by breaking ground on a $100 million Islamic center cum mosque at the site of the most horrific attack in American history? In the nine years since the atrocities that claimed the lives of nearly 3,000 Americans at the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, and a field in Shanksville, Pa., such an Islam — if it really existed — would have spearheaded the defeat of America’s enemies.
Such an Islam, over nine long years, would have risen up and made itself heard. It would have identified by name and condemned with moral outrage the imposters purporting to act in its name. It would have honored America’s sacrifice of blood and treasure in the liberation of oppressed Muslim peoples. It would have said “thank you” to our troops. It would have joined America, without ambiguity or hesitation, in crushing terror networks and dismantling the regimes that abet them. It would not have needed trillion-dollar American investments to forge democracies; it would naturally have adopted democracy on its own.
What excruciating truths have we yet failed to grasp on this ninth anniversary of 9/11? The first is that such an Islam does not exist. The second is that, despite this fact, American foreign and domestic policy continues to proceed as though it does exist — and as though it were the only real Islam. That is, nine years after Islamists made their commitment to our destruction as unmistakable as possible, nine years after the non-occurrence of all the wonderful things that would certainly have happened if the Islam of our dreams were the Islam of our reality, our national-security strategy is still steeped in fiction.
Self-delusion is a convenient policy. It resists defining missions with anything but the most detached, politically correct loftiness. Serial attacks by readily identifiable enemies seamlessly become a nebulous “war on terror,” then a “long struggle against violent extremism,” then an “overseas contingency operation.” If you stubbornly avoid saying whom you’re fighting and why, pretty soon no one remembers — the better to define down success — don’t say victory. So we gradually slide from “You’re with us or you’re with the terrorists,” to “draining the swamps,” to “the forward march of freedom,” to the creation of “democracies” that are reliable American “allies in the war on terror,” to “democracy-lite, and please pass the sharia,” to “shoot for stability,” to “Why not negotiate with the Taliban? Look how well the engagement with Iran is going.”
We may succeed in kidding ourselves, but our enemies aren’t fooled. By 9/11, Iran had been braying “Death to America!” and matching word with deed for over 20 years.
The mullahs heard all the “You’re with us or with the terrorists” banter, but they also saw it followed up with a policy of entreaty, appeasement, and capitulation. So they did what any jihadist taking our measure would do: They spent the ensuing nine years helping other jihadists kill Americans. The only difference now is that they’re about to be a jihadist nuclear power — a status they must have known was a shoo-in once the chorus of American politicians began pronouncing it “unacceptable.”
In the two new “democracies” we’ve built, sharia reigns, as it was bound to do when the State Department wrote it into the new constitutions — Islam being one of our purported weapons against terrorism. One result is that homosexuals and religious minorities are brutally persecuted.
In Iraq, where half the public still sees attacks on U.S. troops as legitimate, democratic elections are now contests in which candidates vie to show who is most anti-American. To the new Iraq, Iran is the most important ally. Indeed, if war broke out with Iran tomorrow, American forces in Iraq would be barred from launching attacks against Tehran. We’ve pledged not to use our costly military presence in Iraq against any other country — the only country for which the Shiite government would waive that prohibition is Israel.
Meantime, in Afghanistan, the U.S.-backed Karzai government is desperately seeking a deal with the Taliban — the Islamist terrorists the State Department refuses to designate as terrorists. As the Wall Street Journal reports, the Afghan government even convened a conference of clerics to enact a resolution calling for more exacting enforcement of sharia, the Taliban’s key demand. In response, the Taliban have stepped up the pace of bombings and assassinations. They are convinced, as Karzai is convinced, that President Obama will begin pulling out next year, just as he said he would. We imagine a cozy life with a “moderate” Taliban; the actual Taliban intend on ruling with remorseless sharia.
At home, even as al-Qaeda continues its efforts to reprise 9/11, a network of Islamist organizations — coordinated by the Muslim Brotherhood and financially backed by our friends, the Saudis — proceeds with what it calls its “grand jihad” to eliminate and destroy Western civilization by sabotage. This is not a secret. The Brotherhood’s internal memoranda were seized by the FBI. They boldly announce these claims in black and white. Two years ago, the Justice Department aptly labeled the constituent organizations — including the Islamic Society of North America and the Council on American Islamic Relations — as unindicted co-conspirators in a terrorism-financing case in which several of their partners were convicted of funneling millions of dollars to Hamas. Today, those Islamist organizations are right back in business, with an open door to “engaging” government policymakers, as if nothing ever happened. In our imagination, they’re moderates, too.
One thing never intrudes on our make-believe world: the real 9/11. Before it was Ground Zero, the World Trade Center was a real place, where flesh-and-blood Americans were slaughtered — some of them leaping over 70 stories to their grisly demise because it seemed more merciful than immolation in the fires that raged within. We try not to think about that much anymore, except for a fleeting moment or two every September 11.
— Andrew C. McCarthy, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, is the author, most recently, of The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America.
I’m unsure as to how new this is or whether or not it’s as “viral” as it appears….but I believe it is worth sharing.
I’ll let this video speak for itself.